Biology 243: Comparative Animal Physiology
Response paper 3:
Compare Gladden's commentary to the Kemper et al. article. What has Gladden added to the scientific discussion? Where has Gladden offered an opinion, argument, or explanation that extends or critiques Kemper's work? Are Gladden's argument convincing? Why or why not?
No more than 1 page, double spaced, 12 pont font.