Criteria for Evaluating Responses to Research Articles
|
Score |
Criteria |
|
0 |
No report |
|
1 |
Serious problems: instructions not followed; sections missing; errors in statements; quotes rather than demonstrating understanding; late |
|
2 |
Acceptable: Instructions followed but some important points left out; excessive in length with lack of priorities; understanding of details, but not clear about context (theory, bigger issues) |
|
3 |
Very good: Deeper insights; clear ranking of importance for different points; critique addresses substantial issues |
|
3+ |
Exceptional: Top 1 or 2%; a special effort with depth building on characteristics of "3" |