|
| 1 |
How could a bacterial
cell have two different versions of the lac operon? |
|
|
|
The two lac operons are on homologous chromosomes
inherited from the mother and father. |
|
|
|
An F' plasmid or a specialized transducing phage could add
a second copy of the lac operon from a previous host. |
|
|
|
Generalized transduction or Hfr conjugation could bring
in a second copy of the operon. |
|
|
|
Bacteria actually replicate two or four copies of their
own chromosome before the cell divides. |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
Which operon will produce
B-galactosidase even if lactose is absent? |
|
|
|
p + o-c lacZ-
lacI + |
|
|
|
p + o + lacZ + lacI
+ |
|
|
|
p - o-c lacZ + lacI
- |
|
|
|
p + o + lacZ + lacI
- |
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
Will this genotype
produce B-galactosidase?
p + o-c lacZ +
lacI +
------------------------
--------
p + o + lacZ -
lacI + |
|
|
|
B-galactosidase will only be expressed in the
presence of lactose. |
|
|
|
The lacI repressor is wild-type, so it will repress expression
of B-galactosidase. |
|
|
|
B-galactosidase will be made continuously. |
|
|
|
B-galactosidase will never be made, because the lacZ- coding
region is defective. |
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
Will B-galactosidase
be expressed?
p + o-c lacZ -
lacI +
------------------------ --------
p + o + lacZ +
lacI + |
|
|
|
Yes, with or without lactose, because the operator
is constitutive. |
|
|
|
B-galactosidase will not be made, because the lacZ- is nonfunctional. |
|
|
|
The lacZ will express B-galactosidase only if lactose is
present to remove repressor and induce the operon. |
|
|
|
The repressor made by lacI will prevent transcription. |
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
Will B-galactosidase
be produced?
p + o + lacZ -
lacI -
----------------------- --------
p + o + lacZ +
lacI + |
|
|
|
Yes, B-galactosidase will be produced when
induced by lactose. |
|
|
|
Yes, constitutively, because of lacI - (a non-functional
repressor gene). |
|
|
|
No, because of the non-functional lacZ - . |
|
|
|
No, because the repressor is nonfunctional. |
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
Will this genotype
produce B-galactosidase?
p + o + lacZ
+ lacI -
-----------------------
--------
p - o -c lacZ
+ lacI - |
|
|
|
Yes, constitutively, because of o -c. |
|
|
|
Yes, constitutively, because no repressor is made. |
|
|
|
Yes, only with lactose inducer, since the functional promoter
has a wild-type operator. |
|
|
|
No, because there is a non-functional promoter p - . |
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
Are constitutive operator
alleles dominant or recessive? |
|
|
|
Constitutive alleles of the operator are always
dominant to the wild-type inducible operator. |
|
|
|
Constitutive operator mutations are always recessive. |
|
|
|
Constitutive operator alleles are dominant if the other
cis-acting elements of the operon are functional. |
|
|
|
Constitutive operator alleles are dominant only if the repressor
is nonfunctional. |
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
Are non-functional
repressor alleles dominant or recessive? |
|
|
|
Non-functional repressor alleles are recessive,
because the repressor made by the functional lacI can act on any copy of
the operon. |
|
|
|
Non-functional lacI is dominant because it prevents binding
of functional lacI. |
|
|
|
Non-functional lacI is recessive because non-functional
alleles are always recessive. |
|
|
|
Non-functional lacI is dominant because it eliminates the
entire function of the lac operon. |
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
Could a mutation in
the coding region of lacZ prevent expression of a gene downstream, such
as lacY? |
|
|
|
No, because lacY has its own ribosome binding
site. |
|
|
|
No, because lacY has its own promoter. |
|
|
|
No, because although lacY is part of the lac operon, it
has its own operator site. |
|
|
|
Yes, if a lacZ mutation interrupts transcription, then lacY
downstream will not be expressed. |
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
Suppose a "superrepressor"
mutation of lacI causes the repressor to bind operator whether or not lactose
is present. Will this allele be dominant or recessive to wildtype lacI? |
|
|
|
Dominant, because expression of all operators
will be repressed. |
|
|
|
Recessive, because lacI- non-functional alleles are always
recessive. |
|
|
|
Recessive, because lacI+ on the other operon will still
be inducible. |
|
|
|
Dominant, so long as it is linked to a functional Lac operon
in cis. |
|
|
|
|
|